Parent-Reported Visual Concerns in Children with Cerebral Visual Impairment Presenting to a Pediatric Neurology Clinic.

Purpose: Children with cerebral visual impairment (CVI) present with delayed developmental milestones. Pediatricians and pediatric neurologists are usually the first point of contact, and eye exam largely remains referral based. This study documented the visual concerns reported by parents of children with CVI visiting a pediatric neurology clinic. Additionally, we investigated the association between visual concerns, functional vision measures and visual functions. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study was undertaken in children with CVI (chronological age range: 7 months-7 years). Visual concerns reported by the parents/caregivers were documented as open-ended statements. Additionally, a functional vision assessment was conducted using the CVI Range instrument with phase 1, 2 and 3 indicating low, moderate and high visual functioning, respectively. Grating acuity and contrast sensitivity were measured using Teller acuity cards-II and Ohio contrast cards respectively. Results: A total of 73 children (mean age of 2.84 ± 1.87 years) were recruited. Sixty-eight parents reported visual concerns that were broadly grouped into 14 unique concerns. Nineteen parents (27.9%) reported more than one visual concern. Difficulty maintaining eye contact and recognizing faces were the top two visual concerns in phases 1 and 2. Missing objects in the lower visual field was the top concern in phase 3. A larger number of visual concerns were reported in phase 1 (43%) than phase 2 (40.6%) and phase 3 (16.2%). Multiple regression analysis revealed that grating acuity, contrast sensitivity and chronological age were able to predict the functional vision, F (3, 55) = 63.0, p < 0.001, r2 = 0.77. Conclusion: Targeted questions enquiring about eye contact and face recognition can be included in history elicitation in children with CVI in pediatric neurology clinics. In the presence of visual concerns, it will be important to assess grating acuity and contrast sensitivity. A poor functional vision score requires referral for eye examination and vision rehabilitation services.

Grating acuity tests for infants, young children and individuals with disabilities: A review of recent advances.

BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of visual acuity is important in managing any ocular condition. Measuring visual acuity has always remained a challenge in infants, young children and individuals with disabilities who are unable to respond verbally. A variety of pediatric acuity tests that include both grating and recognition acuities have been described in the literature, some of which are outdated. This review paper aims to summarize the currently available and recently developed grating acuity tests that can be used for infants, young children and individuals with disabilities. METHODS: A review of literature was carried out to identify tests that were currently available and recently developed. Additionally, search was also done on popular search engines and websites of companies. Tests identified were screened for availability and investigated for validity through published research in peer-reviewed journals. RESULTS: A total of eight grating acuity tests were identified, out of which six of them were paper-based tests. The remaining two tests were app-based tests with established data for the typically developing pediatric cohort. The repeatability indices were available only for four grating acuity tests. CONCLUSIONS: This review paper summarizes the basic features of the grating acuity tests and importantly, the parameters that determine the clinical utility of the tests such as the testability, acuity range, specific cohort studied, testing time and reliability indices. The paper also discusses the recent technological advancements in the field of acuity testing for the pediatric cohort and its comparisons with the conventional methods when available.

Clinical Utility of 'Peekaboo Vision' Application for Measuring Grating Acuity in Children with Down Syndrome.

Peekaboo Vision is an iPad grating acuity app built with typically developing children in mind. Given the ease of using this app in the pediatric age group, this study determined its clinical utility in children with Down syndrome. Two groups of participants (children with Down syndrome and age-matched controls) were included. Presenting binocular grating acuity was measured using Peekaboo Vision and Teller acuity cards II in random order. Parents' feedback about their child's engagement and time taken to complete each test was documented. Thirty-seven children with Down syndrome (males = 23; mean age = 8.1 ± 4.2 years) and 28 controls (males = 15; mean age = 8.71 ± 3.84 years) participated. Time taken to complete the tests was comparable (p = 0.83) in children with Down syndrome. Controls were significantly faster with Peekaboo Vision (p = 0.01). Mean logMAR acuities obtained with Peekaboo Vision (0.16 ± 0.34) and Teller acuity cards II (0.63 ± 0.34) were significantly different (p < 0.001) in children with Down syndrome (mean difference in acuities: -0.44 ± 0.38 logMAR (95% LoA: -1.18 to 0.3). For controls, the mean logMAR acuity with Peekaboo Vision (-0.13 ± 0.12) and Teller acuity cards II (0.12 ± 0.09) was also found to be significantly different (p < 0.001) (mean difference in acuities: -0.24 ± 0.14 logMAR (95% LoA: -0.51 to 0.03) Peekaboo Vision test can be used on children with Down syndrome. Peekaboo Vision and Teller acuity cards II can be used independently but not interchangeably. The differences in the acuity values between the two tests could be a result of the differences in the thresholding paradigms, different testing mediums and the range of acuities covered.

Prevalence of visual hallucinations.

BACKGROUND: To determine the prevalence of visual hallucinations and to report its associations with demographic and clinical factors in a population-based survey in India. METHODS: Prevalence of visual hallucinations was determined as a part of a large prospective, cross-sectional, population-based study that was carried out in two districts of Telangana, namely Khammam and Warangal. Multi-stage cluster random sampling was used in this study. The administration of the questionnaire preceded the clinical examination of the subjects. Associations with factors such as age, sex, education level and visual impairment categories were studied using univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Out of the 6,000 subjects who were enumerated from the 120 clusters in Khammam and Warangal districts, a total of 4,936 (82.3 per cent) responded. The mean age of the participants was 55.6 ± 11.8 years. Only the older age group (> 70 years of age) was associated with visual hallucinations on univariate analysis (p < 0.001). On multiple logistic regression, subjects with moderate visual impairment were found to have higher odds of experiencing visual hallucinations (odds ratio 1.48; 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.96, p = 0.006) and those who were older also had higher odds (odds ratio 1.35, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of visual hallucinations among those with visual impairment in this population-based study was 13.8 per cent. The older age group and moderate visual impairment were noted to be the associated factors among individuals experiencing visual hallucinations.

Screening for Charles Bonnet syndrome: Should the definition be reconsidered?

Purpose: Charles Bonnet syndrome (CBS) is a condition in which individuals with visual impairment (VI) and with no cognitive deficits experience visual hallucinations, typically with no other sensory hallucinations. Although few isolated case reports of CBS from India have been published, the prevalence for CBS in India is largely unknown. The primary aim of this study was to estimate CBS prevalence in patients with vision impairment visiting a tertiary eye care center. Methods: The study was conducted in two phases. In phase 1, patients with VI, age ≥40 years with presenting visual acuity worse than 20/63 were enrolled. In phase 2, patients with presenting visual acuity worse than 20/63 and/or with binocular visual field loss, age ≥18 years were recruited. A CBS survey was administered only to those who passed a screening test for cognition impairment. Results: A total of 218 patients were screened (phase 1 = 113 and phase 2 = 105). Two-hundred ten patients (mean age ± standard deviation = 49.2 ± 17.3 years, males = 139) were found eligible to complete the CBS survey. Fourteen patients were found to have visual hallucinations. In addition, three other patients had visual hallucinations with associated auditory input to the visual imagery. All patients had complete insight about their hallucinations. Conclusion: Depending on the inclusion criteria, we found the prevalence for CBS in patients with VI to vary between 6.7% to 8.1% (if including patients with auditory input). More investigation is needed to assess the associated role of other sensory inputs (e.g. auditory) with the visual imagery experienced in CBS.

Near vision in individuals with Down syndrome: a vision screening study.

OBJECTIVES: Children with Down syndrome are known to have reduced focusing ability for near vision (hypoaccommodation). Through a vision screening study we investigated the correlation between hypoaccommodation and near visual acuity in individuals with Down syndrome. METHODS: A cross-sectional vision screening study was conducted on individuals with Down Syndrome. The screening was done in 4 city schools and 1 screening was conducted as a part of the Special Olympics Bharat program. In addition to the conventional vision screening tests, Nott dynamic retinoscopy was also performed. Both adults and children (age < 18 years) were included. RESULTS: A total of 55 participants (33 children: age 6 to 17 years, 22 adults: age 18 to 41 years) with Down syndrome were screened. Twenty-two participants had visual impairment. Accommodative accuracy was assessed in 29 children and 13 adults. Accommodative lag ( ≥1.00D) was present in 12 children (41.37%) and 7 adults (53.84%). No correlation was found between the lag of accommodation and near visual acuity (ρSpearman = 0.15, p = 0.54). LogMAR near visual acuity was inversely correlated (ρSpearman = -0.841, p < 0.001) to the near viewing distance. CONCLUSION: Near visual acuity by itself is not a sensitive indicator of accommodative dysfunction. In addition, a closer viewing distance may not indicate adequate amplitude of accommodation. These findings strongly suggest the need for including dynamic retinoscopy in the clinical practice while examining individuals with Down syndrome.

Vision Profile and Ocular Characteristics of Special Olympics Athletes: Report from India.

PURPOSE: Previous reports, albeit isolated, of vision and ocular screening of athletes with intellectual disability participating in the Special Olympics, UK, indicated high rates of refractive error and ocular morbidity; however, there have been no reports of similar sports events for this population from India. This study set out to evaluate the vision profile and ocular characteristics of athletes with intellectual disability attending the Special Olympics Lions Club International Opening Eyes (SOLCIOE) event in 2012 in India. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted, where a protocol-based ophthalmological assessment was performed by trained optometrists at a tertiary eye care center. RESULTS: Overall, 172 athletes (mean age 18.6 years, 70% male) with intellectual disability participated, and 138 (80%) were able to cooperate for complete or nearly complete vision and ocular assessment. A total of 56 (32%) had never had a previous vision or ocular health status examination. A total of 46 (32%) presented with low vision (World Health Organization definition <6/18 to 3/60 in the better eye), 21% needed a first or updated spectacle prescription, and 28% had significant ocular pathology as the cause of visual loss. CONCLUSIONS: The proportions of refractive errors and ocular disorders in athletes with intellectual disability attending the SOLCIOE program in South India are similar to those reported for able-bodied school-aged children in urban and rural India. Like that of their able-bodied peers, the visual needs of children with intellectual disability are also not adequately being met.

Assessing the effectiveness of low vision rehabilitation in children: an observational study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the change in visual functioning (VF) using the L. V. Prasad-Functional Vision Questionnaire II (LVP-FVQ II) following multidisciplinary low vision rehabilitation (LVR) services in children with low vision (LV). METHODS: Children with LV referred for the first time to the Centre for Sight Enhancement were administered the LVP-FVQ II at baseline and at 3 to 4 months' follow-up to assess the outcomes of LVR. Participants' responses to the LVP-FVQ II at baseline and follow-up were transformed into interval-level estimates of VF using Rasch analysis. Cohen's d values (effect size) were used to estimate the magnitude of change in VF. RESULTS: A total of 183 participants completed the rehabilitation (mean age, 11.9 years; male, 57%). More than one-half of the participants had retinal disorders (55%) and most were moderately visually impaired (<20/60-20/200, 76.5%). Using the LVP-FVQ II, significant improvement in VF after rehabilitation was recorded (P < 0.0001) and the increase in VF (SD) was 1.20 (1.82) logits. Using Cohen's d, the magnitude of the improvement in LVR intervention at follow-up was found to be 0.75, indicating nearly large treatment effect. CONCLUSIONS: Ours is the first study to provide strong evidence that LVR services result in nearly large and significant improvements in the overall VF in children with LV, regardless of the cause of LV. These results should encourage eye care professionals to refer children with LV to LVR services. Further investigation is needed to determine if the improvement in VF can be sustained over a longer duration (>4 months).

The patient health questionnaire-9: validation among patients with glaucoma.

BACKGROUND: Depression and anxiety are two common normal responses to a chronic disease such as glaucoma. This study analysed the measurement properties of the depression screening instrument - Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) using Rasch analysis to determine if it can be used as a measure. METHODS: In this hospital-based cross-sectional study, the PHQ-9 was administered to primary glaucoma adults attending a glaucoma clinic of a tertiary eye care centre, South India. All patients underwent a comprehensive clinical evaluation. Patient demographics and sub-type of glaucoma were abstracted from the medical record. Rasch analysis was used to investigate the following properties of the PHQ-9: behaviour of the response categories, measurement precision (assessed using person separation reliability, PSR; minimum recommended value 0.80), unidimensionality (assessed using item fit [0.7-1.3] and principal components analysis of residuals), and targeting. RESULTS: 198 patients (mean age ± standard deviation  = 59.83±12.34 years; 67% male) were included. The native PHQ-9 did not fit the Rasch model. The response categories showed disordered thresholds which became ordered after category reorganization. Measurement precision was below acceptable limits (0.62) and targeting was sub-optimal (-1.27 logits). Four items misfit that were deleted iteratively following which a set of five items fit the Rasch model. However measurement precision failed to improve and targeting worsened further (-1.62 logits). CONCLUSIONS: The PHQ-9, in its present form, provides suboptimal assessment of depression in patients with glaucoma in India. Therefore, there is a need to develop a new depression instrument for our glaucoma population. A superior strategy would be to use the item bank for depression but this will also need to be validated in glaucoma patients before deciding its utility.

Rasch validation of the PHQ-9 in people with visual impairment in South India.

BACKGROUND: The Patient-Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a widely used screening instrument for depression. Recently, its properties as a measure were investigated using Rasch analysis in an Australian population with visual impairment (VI) and it was demonstrated to possess excellent measurement properties, but the response scale required shortening (modified PHQ-9). However, further validation was recommended to substantiate its use with the growing population of VI. Therefore, we aimed to use Rasch analysis to evaluate the measurement properties of the modified PHQ-9 in an Indian population with VI. METHODS: 303 patients with VI (mean age 40.2 years; 71% male) referred to Vision Rehabilitation Centres were administered the PHQ-9 by trained interviewer. Rasch analysis was used to investigate the psychometric properties of the modified PHQ-9. RESULTS: Rasch analysis showed good fit to the model, no misfitting items and an acceptable person separation reliability (0.82). Dimensionality testing supported combining 9 items to create a total score. Targeting was sub-optimal (-1.30 logits); more difficult items are needed. One item ('trouble falling asleep') showed notable differential item functioning, DIF (1.18 logits) by duration of VI. LIMITATIONS: The generalisability of these results might be restricted to patients with VI presenting to a tertiary eye care centre. CONCLUSIONS: Except for DIF, the performance of the modified PHQ-9 is consistent with that of the original, albeit in a different cultural context (Indian population with VI). Clinicians/researchers can readily use the modified PHQ-9 without formal training in Rasch procedures given the provision of ready-to-use spreadsheets that convert raw to Rasch-scaled scores. However the conversions will apply only if the sample being tested is similar to that of the present study.

Is utility-based quality of life in adults affected by glaucoma?

PURPOSE: We evaluated the utility values (UVs), using the time trade off (TTO) technique, associated with primary glaucoma and varying degrees of visual field (VF) loss. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 198 adults (mean age, 59.8 years) with primary glaucoma were recruited from the glaucoma clinic of a tertiary center in Hyderabad, South India. Each patient underwent comprehensive glaucoma evaluation, and completed the utility (TTO) and Glaucoma Quality of Life-15 questionnaires (Rasch version, Glaucoma Activity Limitation [GAL]-10). Better mean deviation (MD, using Humphrey Field Analyzer program 24-2) between two eyes was used to classify participants into mild, moderate, and severe VF loss groups. Utilities (range, 0.0-1.0) derived by TTO technique (lifetime traded against perfect vision) and interval level Rasch scores of GAL-10 were used for analyses. RESULTS: Mean UV was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.84); that is, a decrease in quality of life (QoL) of 19%. Of the subjects, 59% were willing to trade lifetime in return of perfect vision; those willing to trade were significantly younger with poorer acuity in the worse-seeing eye. In univariate and multivariate analysis, severe VF loss in the worse eye was associated with lower UV (ß = -0.108; 95% CI, -0.201 to -0.014; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that primary glaucoma in adults causes substantial decrease in UVs (and QoL thereof), and is highly dependent on the severity of VF loss in the worse eye.

Rasch analysis of Impact of Vision Impairment for Children questionnaire.

PURPOSE: To validate the Indian-translated Impact of Vision Impairment for Children (IVI_C), a vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) instrument, and to investigate the effect of sociodemographic and ocular characteristics on VRQoL. METHODS: The 24-item IVI_C was administered face to face to 221 children with vision impairment (VI) (mean age, 12.6 years; male, 68%) referred to the Vision Rehabilitation Centres. Rasch analysis was used to investigate the IVI_C for key indices such as measurement precision as measured by person separation (minimum recommended value, 2.0), unidimensionality (i.e., whether all the items contribute toward measurement of a single underlying construct as assessed by item fit and principal component analysis of residuals), targeting of items to participants' VRQoL (i.e., matching of item difficulty to participant ability; ideal targeting, <1.0 logits). Univariate analysis was performed to determine if the person scores of IVI_C were significantly different across participant subgroups stratified by sociodemographic and ocular characteristics, including the severity of VI. RESULTS: The IVI_C showed misfit to the model and lacked unidimensionality. Principal component analysis confirmed the presence of an additional construct, mobility, but it did not possess adequate person separation when assessed individually. Deleting the mobility-related items restored unidimensionality, but additional items misfit, necessitating item reduction. Finally, a 17-item IVI_C possessed good measurement precision (person separation, 2.04), was unidimensional (albeit not purely), and consisted of items that fit the Rasch model and were well targeted to the participants' VRQoL (targeting 0.76 logits). There was no statistically significant difference in the VRQoL across subgroups stratified by age, sex, type of school, cause of VI, duration of vision loss, and severity of VI (p > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: The revised 17-item IVI_C is shorter and has better psychometric properties than the original version in school-aged children with VI in India, and the responses are unrelated to sociodemographic and clinical variables. Although it has the potential for use in cross-sectional and outcomes research in children with VI, caution should be exercised while interpreting the 17-item IVI_C scores given the presence of slight multidimensionality.

Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire: evaluation in visually impaired.

PURPOSE: To explore the psychometric properties of the revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire (OBVQ) in children with visual impairment (VI) using Rasch analysis. METHODS: One hundred fifty Indian children with VI between 8 and 16 years (mean age, 11.6 years; 69% male; mean acuity in the better eye of 0.80 logMAR [Snellen, 20/126]) were administered the revised OBVQ. The 40-item revised OBVQ was developed to assess victimization (i.e., being bullied) and bullying (bullying others) in normally sighted schoolchildren. Only 16 items are used for Rasch analysis and are divided into two parts: I (victimization, eight items) and II (bullying others, eight items). Separate Rasch analysis was conducted for both parts, and the psychometric properties investigated included behavior of rating scale, extent to which the items measured a single construct (unidimensionality by fit statistics and principal component analysis [PCA] of residuals); ability to discriminate among participants' victimization and bullying behaviors (measurement precision as assessed by person separation reliability [PSR] minimum recommended value, 0.80); and targeting of items to participants' victimization and bullying. RESULTS: Response categories were misused for both parts I and II, which required repair before further analysis. Measurement precision was inadequate for both parts (PSR, 0.64 for part I and 0.19 for part II), indicating poor discriminatory ability. All items fit the Rasch model well in part I, indicating unidimensionality that was further confirmed using PCA of residuals. However, an item misfit in part II that required deletion following which the remaining items fit and PCA of residuals also supported unidimensionality. Targeting was -0.58 logits for part I, indicating that the items were matched well with the participants' victimization. By comparison, targeting was suboptimal for part II (-1.97 logits). CONCLUSIONS: In its current state, the revised OBVQ is not a valid psychometric instrument to assess victimization and bullying among children with VI.

Assessment of the impact of keratoconus on vision-related quality of life.

PURPOSE: We determined if the Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) is a valid questionnaire to measure the vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) in keratoconus patients, and investigated if the VRQoL varied with disease severity in this sample. METHODS: WE RECRUITED 160 CONSECUTIVE BILATERAL KERATOCONUS PATIENTS (MEAN AGE 23.3 YEARS, 63% MALE) FROM AN INDIAN TERTIARY EYE CARE CENTER. PARTICIPANTS UNDERWENT A CLINICAL EXAMINATION AND COMPLETED THE IVI. PARTICIPANTS WERE DIVIDED INTO THREE GROUPS BASED ON THE AVERAGE OF THE STEEP KERATOMETRY (K) READINGS: mild (average Sim K < 45 diopters [D]), moderate (average Sim K 45-52 D), and severe (average Sim K > 52 D). Rasch analysis was used to validate the IVI and the VRQoL scores thus obtained were compared across the disease groups. RESULTS: THE MAJORITY (63%) OF PATIENTS HAD SEVERE, WHILE THE REMAINDER (37%) HAD MODERATE KERATOCONUS. RASCH ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATED THE VALIDITY OF THE IVI TO ASSESS VRQOL THROUGH TWO SUBSCALES: vision-specific functioning (VF) and emotional well-being (EWB). There was no significant difference in VF (mean change -0.16, P = 0.55) and EWB scores (mean change -0.32, P = 0.23) between moderate and severe keratoconus groups. CONCLUSIONS: The revised IVI subscales have interval-level measurement properties, which support their suitability to measure VRQoL in this keratoconus sample. Patients with moderate or severe keratoconus had similar, but higher VRQoL scores as assessed by the revised IVI subscales, indicating lack of impact of the disease on their VRQoL. However, this does not exclude the possibility of finding an impact in other populations.

The second version of the L. V. Prasad-functional vision questionnaire.

PURPOSE: The L. V. Prasad-Functional Vision Questionnaire (LVP-FVQ) was developed using Rasch analysis to assess self-reported difficulties in performing daily tasks in school children with visual impairment (VI) in India. However, the LVP-FVQ has psychometric problems of inadequate measurement precision and lack of detailed assessment of dimensionality. Furthermore, items pertaining to use of technology are lacking. The aim of this study was to present the development and validation of the second version of LVP-FVQ (LVP-FVQ II). METHODS: Development of LVP-FVQ II involved extracting items from other similar questionnaires (albeit developed for Western populations) and focus group discussions of children with VI and their parents that resulted in a 32-item pilot questionnaire. Overall, six items from the LVP-FVQ were retained. The questionnaire underwent pilot testing in 25 such children, following which a 27-item LVP-FVQ II emerged, and this was administered to 150 children with VI. Response to each item was rated on a three-category scale. Rasch analysis was used to validate the LVP-FVQ II. RESULTS: Rating scale was used by participants as was intended to. Four mobility-related items required deletion, as these did not contribute toward measurement of a single construct, indicating a secondary dimension. Deletion of the four items resulted in the 23-item unidimensional LVP-FVQ II, with good measurement precision, effective targeting of item difficulty to participant ability, and lack of notable differential item functioning. The LVP-FVQ II has high reliability, indicating that it is effectively able to discriminate between visual disability of school children in India, and is valid across age, gender, duration of VI, and location of residence. CONCLUSIONS: Given the superior measurement properties and the interval-level scores, the LVP-FVQ II appears to offer advantages over LVP-FVQ in assessment of difficulties in performing daily tasks in this population. It can be adapted for use in other developing countries.

Impact of glaucoma on visual functioning in Indians.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of glaucoma on visual functioning in Indians. METHODS: Patients attending the glaucoma service who had undergone a comprehensive glaucoma evaluation were recruited. Better mean deviation (MD, using Humphrey Field Analyzer program 24-2) between two eyes was used to classify participants into mild, moderate, and severe visual field (VF) loss groups. Participants were administered the Glaucoma Quality of Life-15 (GQL-15) questionnaire. Rasch analysis was used to validate the GQL-15 and its four subscales. Linear regression was used to determine associations between GQL-15 scores and VF loss after adjusting for sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients (mean age ± SD, 59.8 ± 12.3 years; 67% male) were recruited. Participants with severe VF loss (39%) followed by mild loss (35%) comprised the largest group. Rasch analysis resulted in a 10-item reliable and valid questionnaire: the Glaucoma Activity Limitation-10 (GAL-10). Although a single subscale, "peripheral vision," met requirements of the Rasch model, it could not be preserved in the GAL-10. In multivariate analyses, the middle-income group (compared with higher income) and severe VF-loss (compared with mild VF-loss) participants reported significantly poorer functioning on GAL-10 ([ß = 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.16-1.52; P = 0.02] and [ß = 1.19; 95% CI, 0.61-1.78; P < 0.000], respectively). None of these associations were, however, clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Glaucoma patients in India, especially those with severe VF loss, face significant challenges in performing daily tasks and in mobility. It is important to prevent progression such that activity limitation is minimized in glaucoma patients.

National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire or Indian Vision Function Questionnaire for visually impaired: a conundrum.

PURPOSE: Both the long form visual functioning scale (LFVFS(39)) and visual functioning scale (VFS) are measures of visual functioning (VF) that represent the Rasch-scaled versions of the NEI-VFQ(39) and the Indian vision function questionnaire (IND-VFQ), respectively. The objectives of this study were to investigate if the 15-item LFVFS(39) and 13-item VFS of the IND-VFQ meet the assumptions of the Rasch model and measure the same construct, VF, in an Indian visually impaired (VI) population. METHODS: Data from 120 VI adults administered both instruments concurrently, were fitted to the Rasch measurement model to demonstrate that each instrument satisfies the assumptions of the model (including unidimensionality by principal components analysis); and both instruments can be cocalibrated onto a single underlying continuum of VF. RESULTS: Both instruments required category reorganization for optimal rating scale functioning and possessed similar measurement precision (person separation = 2.76). Separate analysis of each instrument (eigenvalues, 2.3 and 1.9 for LFVFS(39) and VFS of IND-VFQ, respectively) and the pooled 28-item analyses (eigenvalue, 2.8) satisfied the assumptions of the Rasch model, including unidimensionality. Furthermore, all items fit in the separate and pooled analyses. Separate item and person measures for each instrument correlated strongly with estimates from the pooled data (r > 0.9 for all, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS; Both the LFVFS(39) and VFS of the IND-VFQ measure the same construct, VF, and with equal measurement precision in an Indian VI population. Both instruments can be calibrated onto a single metric, thereby, enabling a comparison of their measurement range of VF.

Rasch analysis of the Indian vision function questionnaire.

AIM: To investigate the psychometric properties of the three scales (general functioning, psychosocial impact, visual symptoms) of the Indian vision function questionnaire (IND-VFQ) using the Rasch measurement model. METHODS: 236 visually impaired patients referred to vision rehabilitation centres were administered the 33-item IND-VFQ. Rasch analysis was used to investigate the scales for the following properties: precision by person separation (ie, discrimination between strata of patient ability, recommended minimum value 2.0), unidimensionality (ie, measurement of a single construct) and targeting (ie, matching of item difficulty to patient ability). RESULTS: Only the general functioning scale possessed adequate measurement precision (person separation 3.49). However, it lacked unidimensionality as some items did not contribute towards the measurement of a single construct indicating a secondary dimension. This comprised seven mobility items, which formed a separate valid subscale with good targeting (-0.57 logits). Deleting these items restored unidimensionality but a misfitting item required removal. Following this the 13 items fit and were visual functioning related. However, targeting was suboptimal (-1.13 logits). CONCLUSIONS: The general functioning scale of the IND-VFQ consists of two separate unidimensional constructs: visual functioning and mobility. Both these Rasch scaled versions with good psychometric properties are effective tools for the assessment of visually impaired patients in India.